📚 Docs / The AI Council
🤖 AI Analytics · Guide

The AI Council — eight engines, one verdict, dissent on the record

Most "AI signals" are a single black box and a green arrow. The AI Council is the opposite: eight independent analytical engines each vote long, short or abstain on the chart you're looking at, their votes are weighted into one verdict — and the members who disagreed are listed right on the card. You always see the argument, not just the answer.

Why a council, not an oracle

Ensembles beat single models when their errors are uncorrelated — and our members look at deliberately different things: price geometry, regime state, the order book, remembered liquidity, lifecycle phase, compression, volume profile, funding. When they agree, that agreement is informative precisely because they could have disagreed. And when they disagree, that is information too — which is why dissent is displayed, never averaged away silently. A 5–3 long is a different trade than an 8–0 long, and the card makes sure you know which one you're seeing.

📐 MTF trend 🧭 market state 🌋 lifecycle 📊 order book 🔋 liquidity field 🎯 ignition 🧲 volume profile 💸 funding ▲ LONG · score +0.46 weighted vote · 5▲ 2▼ 1 abstain dissent 🔋 field ▼ · 💸 funding ▼ shown, never hidden members that lack fresh data abstain visibly — an abstention is information, not an error
Eight uncorrelated views, one weighted verdict — with the minority opinion printed on the card.

The eight members

MemberLooks atContributes
📐 Multi-TF trendPrice geometry across 5m→4hAlignment or conflict of trends across horizons — the heaviest single voice.
🧭 Market stateThe regime engine (trend/range/unknown)Context: the same setup means different things in different regimes.
📊 Order bookLive depth imbalance and microstructureThe only member watching present intent rather than history.
🔋 Liquidity fieldLMF battery levels above/below priceWhere remembered support and fragility sit.
🌋 LifecyclePump Watch phaseA veto-grade voice on pumped or dumped names.
🎯 IgnitionCompression/expansion compositeWhether a move is loading, firing or exhausted.
🧲 Volume profilePOC distance and sideMagnet pull — which way profile gravity points.
💸 FundingFunding rate postureCrowding: extreme funding is fuel for the squeeze against the crowd.

How the verdict is computed

Each member returns a signed score with a confidence; the council weighs them (trend and book carry the most, funding the least) and sums to a verdict score. Small magnitudes render as neutral — the council is allowed to say "no edge here," and that answer is treated as a first-class outcome, not a failure. Members whose inputs are stale or unavailable abstain visibly: you'll see exactly which seats were empty when the vote was taken. All members are evaluated in parallel against shared market history, so the card appears in about a second, warm in far less.

Reading the card

  • Verdict banner — direction, score, and vote split at a glance.
  • Multi-timeframe chips — the trend call per horizon; conflict between 5m and 4h is exactly the nuance a single number would erase.
  • Member rows — every vote, weight and one-line reason.
  • Dissent list — who voted against the verdict and why. Read this first: the strength of a signal is the weakness of its best counter-argument.

The card lives in the chart's indicator menu on any chart in the platform — Trading Desk, desks, screener click-throughs — pinned to the chart corner, draggable anywhere, and it remembers where you put it.

Using it in a workflow

The council is a second opinion, deliberately not an autopilot — it never places orders. The intended loop: a screener surfaces a candidate → the council synthesizes every engine's view of it in one card → you deploy the MM desk or a grid with direction gates armed, and the risk stack holds authority above everything. Analysis advises; risk governs.

Honest limits

The council synthesizes evidence; it does not see the future, and its members share one blind spot: news. A listing announcement or an exploit will blindside all eight seats at once. That is why the verdict is advisory, why abstentions are visible, and why nothing the council says outranks a stop.

FAQ

Is this a large language model?

No — the members are deterministic analytical engines (trend, regime, book, profile, lifecycle…). Same chart, same data, same verdict: fully reproducible, no hallucination surface.

Can the council trade for me?

By design, no. It advises; the desks trade, and the desks answer to the risk stack. Keeping analysis and execution separate is a safety property, not a missing feature.

Which plan includes it?

The AI Council is included from the Trader plan ($12.99/mo). See pricing.

Open it in the terminal: any chart → Indicators menu → 🤖 AI Council. Drag the card anywhere; it stays where you leave it.

Related guides

Get a second opinion on every chart

Eight engines, one card, dissent included — from $12.99/month.